October 31, 2008 9:11 AM
Obama campaign: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals
For decades, while mainstream people have been earning a living, raising their children, and going to church, a small but extremely dedicated group of left-wing radicals have been working VERY hard to open channels to turn their philosophical Marxist leanings into an American reality.
Coming from that philosophical background, but absent from it for the past 25 years, I have to tell you I am absolutely shocked that they have made this much headway. And that the American people are so brainwashed and complacent with their television shows, Ipods and Wiis that they are like a bunch of tourists headed for the edge of a waterfall unable to hear - or even scoffing at those on the riverbank yelling at them to start rowing away from the edge.
What does it take to make you see that if Obama wins, it means the end of democracy in America? And that those of you whose resentment has been stirred by whatever failure you think our society is guilty of in holding you back from having more will all be sadly disappointed that a socialist system will not improve the quality of your life at all.
Yes, our government needs an overhaul. But socialism and cynicism such as Saul Alinsky's tactics for grasping power will offer no improvement to anyone except those installed in power.
Obama and Ayers were students of Alinsky's. At the beginning of his campaign, when he had his special training/indoctrination for his workers - and isn't that kinda chilling when you think about it? - Obama openly credited Alinsky. See Chicago Sun-Times September 4, 2007 "Ruthless" for Obama.
And see what you think of this brief excerpt from Alinsky's Rules for Radicals:
MASS ORGANIZING TACTICSexcerpted from Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky, pp. 126-140
Tactics mean doing what you can with what you have. Tactics are those conscious deliberate acts by which human beings live with each other and deal with the world around them. In the world of give and take, tactics is the art of how to take and how to give. Here our concern is with the tactic of taking; how the Have-Nots can take power away from the Haves.
For an elementary illustration of tactics, take parts of your face as the point of reference; your eyes, your ears, and your nose. First the eyes; if you have organized a vast, mass-based people's organization, you can parade it visibly before the enemy and openly show your power. Second the ears; if your organization is small in numbers, then...conceal the members in the dark but raise a din and clamor that will make the listener believe that your organization numbers many more than it does. Third, the nose; if your organization is too tiny even for noise, stink up the place.
Always remember the first rule of power tactics:
Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
The second rule is: Never go outside the experience of your people. When an action is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
The third rule is: Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
The fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.
The fourth rule carries within it the fifth rule: Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.
The sixth rule is: A good tactic is one that your people enjoy. If your people are not having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.
The seventh rule is: A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time, after which it becomes a ritualistic commitment...
The eighth rule: Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
The ninth rule: The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
The tenth rule: The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
The eleventh rule is: If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside; this is based on the principle that every positive has its negative...
The twelfth rule: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. you cannot risk being trapped by the enemy in his sudden agreement with your demand and saying "You're right--we don't know what to do about this issue. Now you tell us."
The thirteenth rule: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
In conflict tactics there are certain rules that the organizer should always regard as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and "frozen." By this I mean that in a complex, interrelated, urban society, it becomes increasingly difficult to single out who is to blame for any particular evil. There is a constant, and somewhat legitimate, passing of the buck....
It should be borne in mind that the target is always trying to shift responsibility to get out of being the target....
One of the criteria in picking your target is the target's vulnerability--where do you have the power to start? Furthermore, the target can always say, "Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?" When you "freeze the target," you disregard these arguments and, for the moment, all others to blame.
Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all of the "others" come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target.
The other important point in the choosing of a target is that it must be a personification, not something general and abstract such as a community's segregated practices or a major corporation or City Hall. It is not possible to develop the necessary hostility against, say, City Hall, which after all is a concrete, physical, inanimate structure, or against a corporation, which has no soul or identity, or a public school administration, which again is an inanimate system.
Thanks to Spunk Library: an online anarchist library and archive
An informed electorate is an empowered electorate!
Read all my campaign commentary here.
Posted in Campaign 2008 | Permalink
Comments
Silence is agreement
Posted by: rj | October 31, 2008 1:55 PM
Hi, I enjoy your site and appreciated your post. I just wanted to add that you left out an important part, that is, the dedication of the book ...
“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer“
This is not hard to find on the internet. I found it at ... http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/09/23
Posted by: NKM | October 31, 2008 2:49 PM
Is not socialism an economic system and democracy a govenmental system which could easily coexist with socialism. Why do you perceive an economic change as a threat to democracy? Are not both for the "people".
Posted by: Azura | November 2, 2008 12:14 AM
