October 17, 2008 7:39 AM
Paglia on Palin
I love Camille Paglia. Although we don't agree on all issues, I love her writing and deeply admire her ability to think outside the box of party lines.
For those unfamiliar with Paglia, she is a professor of Humanities and Media Studies at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, author of several books, and regular columnist at Salon.com - which I read religiously each month. She is proud of her Italian heritage and a great lover of the arts - covering a broad spectrum from high to low. She is a Democrat, atheist, feminist and outspoken lesbian who is not afraid to take positions in opposition to the gay political machine: she believes that homosexuality is not inborn, that it should not be taught in schools, and that teens should not be pushed into a gay "identity."
See what I mean about thinking outside the box on party lines? While she is a staunch Democrat, true to her pattern of resisting a knee jerk response - like so many of my liberal friends: I'm-a-Democrat-so--Palin-sucks - she has risen above the political fray to take an honest look at the phenomenon of Sarah Palin.
You will like what she had to say October 7 (yes, I am still catching up) at Salon, part of a long Q&A column titled Nobody's Dummy.
Enjoy!
Yes, both Todd and Sarah Palin, whom most people in the U.S. and abroad had never even heard of until six weeks ago, have emerged as powerful new symbols of a revived contemporary feminism. That the macho Todd, with his champion athleticism and working-class cred, can so amiably cradle babies and care for children is a huge step forward in American sexual symbolism.Although nothing will sway my vote for Obama, I continue to enjoy Sarah Palin's performance on the national stage. During her vice-presidential debate last week with Joe Biden (whose conspiratorial smiles with moderator Gwen Ifill were outrageous and condescending toward his opponent), I laughed heartily at Palin's digs and slams and marveled at the way she slowly took over the entire event. I was sorry when it ended! But Biden wasn't -- judging by his Gore-like sighs and his slow sinking like a punctured blimp. Of course Biden won on points, but TV (a visual medium) never cares about that.
The mountain of rubbish poured out about Palin over the past month would rival Everest. What a disgrace for our jabbering army of liberal journalists and commentators, too many of whom behaved like snippy jackasses. The bourgeois conventionalism and rank snobbery of these alleged humanitarians stank up the place. As for Palin's brutally edited interviews with Charlie Gibson and that viper, Katie Couric, don't we all know that the best bits ended up on the cutting-room floor? Something has gone seriously wrong with Democratic ideology, which seems to have become a candied set of holier-than-thou bromides attached like tutti-frutti to a quivering green Jell-O mold of adolescent sentimentality.
And where is all that lurid sexual fantasy coming from? When I watch Sarah Palin, I don't think sex -- I think Amazon warrior! I admire her competitive spirit and her exuberant vitality, which borders on the supernormal. The question that keeps popping up for me is whether Palin, who was born in Idaho, could possibly be part Native American (as we know her husband is), which sometimes seems suggested by her strong facial contours. I have felt that same extraordinary energy and hyper-alertness billowing out from other women with Native American ancestry -- including two overpowering celebrity icons with whom I have worked.
One of the most idiotic allegations batting around out there among urban media insiders is that Palin is "dumb." Are they kidding? What level of stupidity is now par for the course in those musty circles? (The value of Ivy League degrees, like sub-prime mortgages, has certainly been plummeting. As a Yale Ph.D., I have a perfect right to my scorn.) People who can't see how smart Palin is are trapped in their own narrow parochialism -- the tedious, hackneyed forms of their upper-middle-class syntax and vocabulary.
As someone whose first seven years were spent among Italian-American immigrants (I never met an elderly person who spoke English until we moved from Endicott to rural Oxford, New York, when I was in first grade), I am very used to understanding meaning through what might seem to others to be outlandish or fractured variations on standard English. Furthermore, I have spent virtually my entire teaching career (nearly four decades) in arts colleges, where the expressiveness of highly talented students in dance, music and the visual arts takes a hundred different forms. Finally, as a lover of poetry (my last book was about that), I savor every kind of experimentation with standard English -- beginning with Shakespeare, who was the greatest improviser of them all at a time when there were no grammar rules.
Many others listening to Sarah Palin at her debate went into conniptions about what they assailed as her incoherence or incompetence. But I was never in doubt about what she intended at any given moment. On the contrary, I was admiring not only her always shapely and syncopated syllables but the innate structures of her discourse -- which did seem to fly by in fragments at times but are plainly ready to be filled with deeper policy knowledge, as she gains it (hopefully over the next eight years of the Obama presidencies). This is a tremendously talented politician whose moment has not yet come. That she holds views completely opposed to mine is irrelevant.
Even if she disappears from the scene forever after a McCain defeat, Palin will still have made an enormous and lasting contribution to feminism. As I said in my last column, Palin has made the biggest step forward in reshaping the persona of female authority since Madonna danced her dominatrix way through the shattered puritan barricades of the feminist establishment. In 1990, in a highly controversial New York Times op-ed that attacked old-guard feminist ideology, I declared that "Madonna is the future of feminism" -- a prophecy that was ridiculed at the time but that turned out to be quite true. Madonna put pro-sex feminism on the international map.
But it is now 18 years later -- the span of an entire generation. The instabilities and diminishments for young women raised in an increasingly shallow media environment have become all too obvious. I had grown up in a vibrant pop culture with glorious women stars of voluptuous sensuality -- above all Elizabeth Taylor, sewn into that silky white slip as the vixen Manhattan call girl of "Butterfield 8." In college, I feasted on foreign films starring sexual sophisticates like Jeanne Moreau, Anouk Aimée and Catherine Deneuve. Sex today, however, has become brittle and superficial. Except for the occasional diverting flash of Lindsay Lohan's borrowed bosom, I see nothing whatever that is worth a second glance. Pro-sex feminism has worked itself out and, like all movements, has degenerated into clichés. And even Madonna, with her skeletal megalomania, looks like a refugee from a horror movie.
The next phase of feminism must circle back and reappropriate the ancient persona of the mother -- without losing career ambition or power of assertion. Betty Friedan, who had first attacked the cult of postwar domesticity, had long warned second-wave feminists such as Gloria Steinem about the damaging exclusion of homemakers from their value system. The animus of liberal feminists toward religion must also end (I am speaking as an atheist). Feminism must reexamine all of its assumptions, including its death grip on abortion, if it wishes to survive.
The hysterical emotionalism and eruptions of amoral malice at the arrival of Sarah Palin exposed the weaknesses and limitations of current feminism. But I am convinced that Palin's bracing mix of male and female voices, as well as her grounding in frontier grit and audacity, will prove to be a galvanizing influence on aspiring Democratic women politicians too, from the municipal level on up. Palin has shown a brand-new way of defining female ambition -- without losing femininity, spontaneity or humor. She's no pre-programmed wonk of the backstage Hillary Clinton school; she's pugnacious and self-created, the product of no educational or political elite -- which is why her outsider style has been so hard for media lemmings to comprehend. And by the way, I think Tina Fey's witty impersonations of Palin have been fabulous. But while Fey has nailed Palin's cadences and charm, she can't capture the energy, which is a force of nature.
Posted in Campaign 2008, Feminism | Permalink
Comments
Fantastic article! Thanks for sharing it. As a Christian feminist (meaning, I believe it goes against the message of Christ when women are treated as lesser-than's), I heartily agreed with many of the article's points. Sarah Palin is the face of the new feminism. We no longer have to "act like men" in order to be equals. We can be FEMALE, *and* be leaders, shakers, policy makers, WHILE being fully woman. Whether I agree with Palin or not, I love what she's done. No doubt about it, pieces of a shattered glass ceiling are all over the place.
Posted by: molly | October 17, 2008 11:52 AM
That is one of the best pieces of election writing I have ever seen...I am a Camille Paglia fan too, now! :-) (Although it is a tad worrisome how easily I was swayed...) ;-)
She seems so level-headed. I wish there were more like her. Thanks for posting this!!
Posted by: Amanda | October 17, 2008 11:57 AM
Thank you so much for this post. I am a Republican, Christian, and as much as I dislike the connotations of the word-- I probably am a Feminist, and I am an outspoken ex-lesbian.
I think I will be reading Camille Paglia from here on out. I appreciate someone who will think before making judgment.
I have been especially frustrated in this election with those who have gotten excited about Obama but know so few facts, in fact it seems like many would just as soon pass on facts. It seems useless to bring up issues with those who have already chosen the attitude “I’m-a-Democrat-so—Palin sucksâ€
I would like to think I give honest thought to issues before choosing a position. "Thinking" seems like the reasonable thing to do.
My gosh,it scares me that people--regardless of their choice of candidates-- cannot even acknowledge (or recognize?!) just how smart Palin is.
Posted by: Lori | October 17, 2008 12:36 PM
I appreciate your sharing this article, and I appreciate much of what Ms. Paglia has to say. Any time someone with all of those hard left creds thinks outside the PC box, it is encouraging to say the least. But please remember to pray for Camille Paglia. She has also made clear in recent articles that she sees abortion for what it is - the murder of a helpless human being (and she thinks the left should own up to that fact), but she justifies the act by essentially saying might makes right. Her articulation of this rationale was chilling. It really undercut her credibility for me. It is nothing less than monsterous to say, "yes, it is murder, but sometimes you have to do what you have to do (no matter how regrettable)". Given her sharp mind and her willingness to escape the PC plantation, there is reason to hope that she can, with God's grace, become a (pro-life) convert of the magnitude of St. Paul. If she was baptised, Christ claimed her long ago. We should pray for her return.
Posted by: Anne | October 17, 2008 12:56 PM
