Subscribe to MommyLife!
Email:  
Mommy Matters
PAST ISSUES
Email Marketing by Constant Contact®




lighthouse media.png

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions/Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps

Other Interesting Stuff



Our Little Extras: Moms Celebrate Down syndrome!

samurai boy.jpg
Classic Movies for Boys

~Mother and Child Album~

les miz.jpg
Les Miserables Book Study

maddy preset.jpg


March for Life 2009
See for yourself the face of pro-life!

100_0599.JPG

Click for Down
Syndrome news!
Jonny



My Amazon.com Wish List
Kinda like a tip jar :)

catholics come home.jpg

May 18, 2011 10:41 PM

Big Families Are the New Green

IMG_2956.JPG

Big Families Are the New Green

Reduce Your Carbon Footprint, One Baby at a Time

Got a big family? Then you already know that you're crazy, a traitor to feminism, and a slave to the pope; you're neglecting most of your kids and robbing the rest of their childhood; you're a burden on the system in general, and you probably don't own a television set.

But wait, there's more! Don't forget, you're also destroying the earth.

Lately, it's become fashionable for radical environmentalists to denounce large families as irresponsible, even selfish. Maybe you heard the remarks of the chairman of the U.K.'s Sustainable Development Commission, who said that, out of respect for the earth, couples should be legally limited to bearing two "replacement" children.

And yet, if we can get beyond the inflammatory rhetoric, do radical environmentalists have a point? Should we slow down a little? It almost seems like common sense, especially when you're having one of those days when you do feel a little crowded by the swarms of ravening locusts -- uh, I mean, treasured offspring who share your last name.

After all, aren't Catholics supposed to be good stewards of the earth? Isn't it true that we "lotsas" are using more than our share of natural resources, burning more than our share of carbon, and just plain taking up too much space?

Probably not. Moms of many already know that the work of caring for seven children is not the same as caring for one child times seven. In some ways, it's easier. In the same way, many large families actually have a small-er carbon footprint than a typical family with one or two kids. A household of nine is not like a household of three times three. It just doesn't work that way.

Read more at Faith & Family - and then, continue to be fruitful and multiply!

HT: Addie

That's the Curtis family in the picture - Easter 2009. Did I mention big families are FUN?
Love,
signature.gif

Posted in Big families, Pro-Life Issues | Permalink

Comments

Amen to that! The "new green" is plain common sense if you are REALLY into environmentalism. How much more efficient--to raise a dozen in ONE household! All SHARING the same energy resources etc. Talk about good stewardship! Keep on keeping on--(And having fun!) :)

Posted by: llcolton | May 19, 2011 1:29 AM

Post a comment