September 24, 2012 9:12 PM

Queen Michelle starving our kids

Where in the Constitution did we give the First Lady the right to dictate school lunches across the country?



Complaints Mount Against Michelle Obama's New Lunch Menu


Kyle Olson
Sep 23, 2012 Complaints Mount Against Michelle Obama's New Lunch Menu In Wisconsin, high school athletes are complaining about not getting enough to eat each day, due to the skimpy new school lunch menu mandated by the United States Department of Agriculture and First Lady Michelle Obama.

The story we published earlier this week on that subject is unfortunately not unique. Students across the country are complaining about the new school lunch regulations.

Perhaps the real motive is to starve students into slimming down. Just ask students in Pierre, South Dakota who, too, are in an all-out revolt.

"I know a lot of my friends who are just drinking a jug of milk for their lunch. And they are not getting a proper meal," middle school student Samantha Gortmaker told Keloland.com.

Despite the fact that the new regulations have increased the cost of a lunch 20 to 25 cents per plate, it's not pleasing students.

Some are throwing away their vegetables while others are adapting to the rules by becoming industrious. In New Bedford, Massachusetts, students have created a black market - for chocolate syrup. The kiddie capitalists are smuggling in bottles of it and selling it by the squeeze, according to SouthCoastToday.com.

Nancy Carvalho, director of food services for New Bedford Public Schools, was quoted as saying that hummus and black bean salads have been tough sells in elementary cafeterias. That means even smaller children are going through the day fighting hunger pains, which can never be considered a good thing.

One government official tried to put the blame on the students.

"One thing I think we need to keep in mind as kids say they're still hungry is that many children aren't used to eating fruits and vegetables at home, much less at school. So it's a change in what they are eating. If they are still hungry, it's that they are not eating all the food that's being offered," USDA Deputy Undersecretary Janey Thornton was quoted as saying.

Ms. Thornton just put her finger on the problem. The government is trying to impose a new diet that children are not accustomed to. It's not reasonable to expect them to either eat what the government deems healthy or go hungry.

Many will opt to go hungry, and that's the government's fault.

Read more at Townhall.
Love,
signature.gif

Posted in | Permalink

Comments

What happens to the poor kids who then go home to empty cupboards?
Looks like everyone will sacrifice for the husky few. Isn't that like reverse socialism?

Heard Michelle's kid's private school was serving pizza today....

Posted by: kelly | September 25, 2012 2:43 PM

If we place our children in the public school system, we have no one to blame but ourselves. I am not surprised by this one little bit. The moment we delegate the responsibility to educate our children to some government institution that is the moment we lose control. Ever hear of the common course curriculum initiative being discussed in Washington? Look for the days when homeschoolers will be fined for not accepting the public education services akin to the new health care law. We would be wise to pull our kids out of the public school system and to insist that our elected officials dissolve the NEA. My two cents.

Posted by: Raul | September 26, 2012 8:46 AM

I heard that they are going to solve this problem by serving snacks... and of course a federally subsidized "Snack Program." Where will this end?!

Posted by: Kerri | September 28, 2012 9:19 PM

Post a comment